https://fjsr.journal.fi/issue/feedFinnish Journal of Social Research2025-09-04T11:57:50+03:00Editorial teamfinnresearch@utu.fiOpen Journal Systems<p><span class="rpHighlightAllClass rpHighlightSubjectClass" title="" role="heading" aria-level="2">Finnish Journal of Social Research </span>is an annually published peer-reviewed journal focusing on research articles relevant to Finnish society. Its scope is multi-disciplinary, covering sociology, political science, and economics, as well as the other social sciences. The articles published in the journal are to be based on high-quality data and appropriate methods, quantitative or qualitative. All published articles are double-blind peer reviewed by at least two experts. <br><br>We accept submissions throughout the year. Articles will be published online (advance access) once they have been accepted.</p> <p> </p>https://fjsr.journal.fi/article/view/164165Taking back publishing ownership for academia through diamond Open Access2025-09-04T10:55:20+03:00Aki KoivulaIrene PrixAleksi Karhula<p>Editorial note for volume 18 no. 1</p>2025-09-04T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) 2025 Aki Koivula, Irene Prix, Aleksi Karhulahttps://fjsr.journal.fi/article/view/141828Stability or change? The long-term construction of ECEC rationales on the governmental and parliamentary levels in Finland2024-06-27T14:36:07+03:00Marina LundkvistMikael Nygård<p>In recent years, Finnish legislation on Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) has been reformed several times as a way of increasing quality and enhancing children’s learning and wellbeing. However, little research has been conducted on what this means in terms of ECEC rationales on a national level and how such rationales have developed over time. Therefore, the aim of this article is to analyse the political construction of ECEC rationales over time by conducting qualitative content analyses of government bills and minutiae from parliamentary debates relating to three recent reforms (in 2015, 2018 and 2021). We argue that although the discourse on ECEC rationales is mainly characterised by stability, there are also elements of change. Rationales relating to equality, lifelong learning and children’s rights have remained more or less unchanged, while rationales relating to quality ECEC and parental involvement in ECEC have received a more prominent position since 2018.</p>2025-09-04T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) 2025 Marina Lundkvist, Mikael Nygårdhttps://fjsr.journal.fi/article/view/146184Partnership pathways associated with lifetime childlessness in Belgium and Finland2024-11-18T11:56:08+02:00Alice ReesChristine SchnorMarika Jalovaara<p>In recent decades, many European countries have witnessed both a rise in ultimate childlessness and increasing diversity in partnership trajectories. This paper investigates patterns of partnership trajectories associated with childlessness in Belgium and Finland from a life-course perspective. Using sequence and cluster analysis on register data, we examine the partnership histories of Belgian (N=19,590) and Finnish (N=13,368) men and women born in 1975, following them from age 18 to 45. We identified five typical partnership clusters among the Belgian childless and four among the Finnish. Three clusters—Never Partnered, Partnership Instability, and Marriage—are common to both countries. Most childless individuals in both countries remain unpartnered or face partnership instability. A turbulence index was then computed to assess the difference of turbulence of the sequences between the two countries. This paper contributes to the literature on childlessness by examining the heterogeneity of partnership biographies and cross-country differences using high-quality administrative data.</p>2025-09-04T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) 2025 Alice Rees, Christine Schnor, Marika Jalovaarahttps://fjsr.journal.fi/article/view/144754Perceptions of belonging and school climate in diverse Finnish secondary schools2025-01-14T08:50:23+02:00Jenni AlisaariKeith O'NeillAnna KuuselaAleksi SegerAnuleena KimanenSvenja HammerKara ViescaSamaneh Khalili<p class="Abstract"><span lang="EN-GB">We investigate how students in culturally diverse lower secondary schools experience belonging and school climate. The data consist of group interviews with 55 students (14–16 years old). Regarding a sense of belonging, the students discussed inclusion, exclusion and discrimination. The school climate was experienced as highly positive but simultaneously chaotic. The students perceived ethnic diversity as accepted and a marker of inclusion, whereas non-binary gender identity was reported as a reason for exclusion, which may be related to this specific school context. To construct a positive school climate for diversity, more detailed attention must be paid to diverse identities.</span></p>2025-09-04T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) 2025 Jenni Alisaari, Keith O'Neill, Anna Kuusela, Aleksi Seger, Anuleena Kimanen, Svenja Hammer, Kara Viesca, Samaneh Khalili